Share This
Fierce Anticipation: June 12-14
.
a blogumn by Ryan Dixon
FIERCELY ANTICIPATING
IMAGINE THAT or: The Eddie Murphy Code
Hollywood has been trying to crack the secret code to making box office hits since the day the brothers Warner hopped on that train from Pittsburgh to Los Angeles. While that mystery will probably forever remain unsolved, your dear blogumnist has uncovered the heretofore unknown formula to prognosticate the box office fate of none other than the constellation known as Eddie Murphy.
In 1996, after a bleak run of playing vampires, congressman and reprising old roles in lackluster sequels (see, or rather don’t, Vampire in Brooklyn, The Distinguished Gentleman, and Beverly Hills Cop III), Eddie Murphy made a mid-career comeback with The Nutty Professor. At the time of the release, most in the industry attributed the film’s success to Murphy returning to the crazy, “character” comedy style that made him one of the biggest box office stars of the 1980’s.
They were wrong.
The real reason behind The Nutty Professor’s success was that, for those patrons walking past it in a mall or driving under the billboard, the film’s poster hid a number of visual symbols and hieroglyphs that made the film impossible not to go see. Together, they form what I like to call the (Eddie) “Murphy’s Law of Posters”
Like dealing with a Mogwai after midnight, the rules may be simple, but they must be followed fully or certain box office doom will follow:
1. The title must be in red font.
2. A white background is mandatory.
3. Eddie Murphy must share the poster with children, animals, or grotesquely weird and/or fat men, preferably played by him as well.
4. If Eddie Murphy is by himself on the poster, he must appear as a fat man or woman or both.
Those who understand the meaning behind these crypto symbols—Robert Langdon’s of the marketing world each and every one of them—have unlocked their powers, resulting in great success; every subsequent post-Nutty Professor Eddie Murphy movie that has followed the rules above has been a hit*.
Don’t believe me? Here are the posters of the eight of his past fourteen films that followed the law:
The average box office gross for the above films? $104.9 million
And after the jump here are the posters for the seven films released during this same time period that refused to heed the warning of the Fates and paid the ultimate price:
The average box office gross for that cinematic Hall of Shame? $29.6 million.**
The cruelest box office fate was often reserved for those films whose posters may have incorporated one or two, but not all four facets of the law. For example, while the one sheet of Meet Dave included a white background and the title in red font, Eddie Murphy was essentially alone on the poster (the fatal error of Holy Man as well). And, even if you count the mini-Eddie Murphy popping out of the big one’s ear, neither one of these multiple Murphys are a grotesquely weird or fat version of our star.
Of course, Meet Dave was only the second biggest flop of Eddie Murphy’s career. The Titanic — the disaster, not the movie — of his oeuvre was The Adventures of Pluto Nash and one look at the poster will tell you why. It spits in the face of every single aspect of “Murphy’s Law”; Eddie Murphy is standing by himself in front of black starry background, while the title is in orange and purple font. The budget of The Adventures of Pluto Nash: $100 million. The total box office gross of The Adventures of Pluto Nash: $4.4 million.
So, now that we know the rules, let’s take a look at the poster for Eddie Murphy’s new film: Imagine That.
Unfortunately, once again, the marketers at Paramount seemed intent on following the imagistic path to success, only to forget one key component: the red font.
The truth is simple and unforgiving: In the entire history of his career, no Eddie Murphy movie has ever grossed more than $100 million dollars if the some part of the title on the poster wasn’t in red font. In fact, the only movie to which you could make a valid argument against this theory is Coming to America, but even that film’s poster had a thick red background behind the white letters of the title.
So, to all those men and women who spent tireless hours shepherding Imagine That on the tumultuous journey from page to screen, I’m sorry, but the font color has sealed your fate.
*The “Murphy’s Law of Posters” excludes Eddie Murphy’s voice roles in animated films and Dreamgirls, where he played only a supporting role
.
**It should also be noted that if you remove the $75.8 million that Disney managed to eke out of The Haunted Mansion (the poster is a strange anomaly since it doesn’t feature Eddie Murphy at all) the average box office gross for the six remaining rule breakers descends to a moribund $21.9 million.
Now in Theaters
KINDA WANNA WATCH AGAIN
Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal
The dual Blu-ray release of director Adrian Lyne’s two decade zeitgeist tapping erotic twin hits Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal, begs the question: Where’s this decade’s Jaws of the bedroom? A movie that not only graces the top of the box office charts, but also the covers of magazines and newspapers (remember them?).
Perhaps, yet again, the poster did it. In this case the movie I’m referring to is Unfaithful, the 2002 film directed again by Mr. Lyne. Maybe Lyne, in his attempt score a three-decade erotic thriller hat-trick, should have lobbied the 20th Century Fox marketing department a little harder to put the “ ripped paper slash” down the middle of that film’s poster, like Paramount did for both Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal. (“Lyne’s Law of Posters”, anyone?)
Unfortunately, without that “ripped paper slash” Unfaithful’s $52.7 million gross paled in comparison to the $156.6 million and $106.6 million respective box office totals of Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal.
But what if the real reason for the lack of a touchstone erotic thriller in the Oughts is more cultural and less graphical?
Both Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal predicted the epic, true-life tabloid tales that so obsessed us in the 1990’s. These trailer park Greek tragedies revolving around the likes of Amy Fisher, John Wayne Bobbitt and of course, O.J. Simpson (the Oedipus of this crowd) were the main reason that, for the decade between the end of the Cold War and 9/11, our national attention span was focused away from real-world dangers of, say, Osama bin Laden plotting our imminent destruction in a cave in Tora Bora and more to the evils of Jerry Springer and Ice-T’s “Cop Killer”.
Unfortunately, all good things must come to an end, and Götterdämmerung arrived when our 42nd president decided to have his own fatal attraction. But, instead of watching hot Manhattan meatpacking district loft fucking, with a never-to-look-better-again Glenn Close, we were forced to read articles about moist cigars being thrust in between a pair of feminine hips that had all the muscular consistency of Play Doh. What looked like a sex scandal for the ages–a coital Oedipus at Colonous — turned out to be a farce that barely reached the level of Married with Children, let alone Sophocles. To top it all off, our Commander-in-chief never even inserted.
If Bubba’s bedroom bungles weren’t enough, the final death blow for the traditional domestic erotic thriller arrived when the internet stopped being an e-basement for nerdy teens playing WoW and redecorated itself as a sun room for soccer moms.
Both Fatal Attraction and Indecent Proposal exploited the fear of the evil outsider praying on the (false) idyll of the domestic world. But now we live in a world where, thanks to sites like Adult Friend Finder and Craigslist* one can pleasantly carry on with anonymous, adulterous affairs without the threat of finding a bunny boiling in your crock pot or the fear that a one night stand with a mysterious millionaire will force you into a higher tax bracket.
*Why hasn’t Hollywood jumped on a Craig’s List Killer movie yet? Now that could be the Fatal Attraction for the 00’s.
Now Available on Blu-ray and DVD
WOULDN’T RENT IT IF YOU PAID ME
Crossing Over
Poor Harrison Ford (in the artistic, not financial sense). In 2000 he turned down the role that Michael Douglas eventually played in Traffic. If Ford, and not the already Oscar-owning Douglas, had taken on the role of Drug Czar Robert Wakefield in Steven Soderbergh’s film, I would have bet the house that he would have won the Best Supporting Actor Oscar.
But, he didn’t. And, after starring in dead-end gigs like Hollywood Homicide and Firewall during the years after Traffic’s release, you knew his agents weren’t going to turn down the next multi-character, socially important drama that came across their desk. Unfortunately, that movie was Crossing Over, a film whose heavy handed, “take your medicine” dramaturgy makes Crash look like a Best Picture winner. (Oh, wait. What’s that you say? Crash was a Best Picture winner? Oh, god, I think I just threw up in my mouth.)
For many of us whose adolescence was spent in the 80’s and early 90’s, Harrison ford’s appeal was — aside from starring in the two most popular film franchises of all time –reliant on the fact that of all the movie stars of that era, he seemed the most like the idealized version our own fathers– funny, charming, sometimes cranky, but always making sure to do the right thing at the right time.
And now, as many of us are now being confronted by the encroachment of ill health and death upon those fathers, so to is it hard to cope with the fact that Harrison Ford hasn’t had a truly great role in over a decade*. Yet, I have not given up the hope that, like the 46-year-old “over-the-hill” Jack Nicklaus shocking the world with his all-time classic win at the 1986 Masters, Harrison Ford will surprise us with yet one more movie for the ages.
Well done, sir, well done. But question: You've cracked the code on the Murphy posters. But what's your theory on why that iconography works?
A large part of Eddie Murphy's appeal lies in the anarchic spirit he brings to movies and those unsuccessful posters don't have that dynamic at all. Audiences love to see Eddie Murphy in crazy comedies, preferably where he plays a variety of characters. If you look the posters of the movies that failed, none have that over-the-top quality, in fact many of them (Metro, Showtime, I,Spy) show no sense of fun at all.
Of the posters that do work, the only ones where he has the "straight man" look that graces most of the failed posters is the Dr. Dolittle movies. However, as we've seen recently with Marley & Me (whose poster didn't even feature Jennifer Aniston or Owen Wilson) there is no bigger star or box office draw than a cute animal.
Well done, sir, well done. But question: You've cracked the code on the Murphy posters. But what's your theory on why that iconography works?
A large part of Eddie Murphy's appeal lies in the anarchic spirit he brings to movies and those unsuccessful posters don't have that dynamic at all. Audiences love to see Eddie Murphy in crazy comedies, preferably where he plays a variety of characters. If you look the posters of the movies that failed, none have that over-the-top quality, in fact many of them (Metro, Showtime, I,Spy) show no sense of fun at all.
Of the posters that do work, the only ones where he has the "straight man" look that graces most of the failed posters is the Dr. Dolittle movies. However, as we've seen recently with Marley & Me (whose poster didn't even feature Jennifer Aniston or Owen Wilson) there is no bigger star or box office draw than a cute animal.
Your analysis of the "The Eddie Murphy Code" is brilliant! I love it!
Your analysis of the "The Eddie Murphy Code" is brilliant! I love it!
The Murphy Code…wow! I never noticed. Of course my disdain for children, grotesquely fat people, and red fonts have been keeping me away from Murphy films for years.
The Murphy Code…wow! I never noticed. Of course my disdain for children, grotesquely fat people, and red fonts have been keeping me away from Murphy films for years.
Clever as usual!
Clever as usual!
haahah this was awesome. but i still think the the movie will be good and maybe just rake in $76 million since it is missing the red font.
haahah this was awesome. but i still think the the movie will be good and maybe just rake in $76 million since it is missing the red font.
but wait he is wearing a red tie…does that mean anything???
I think it was a last minute attempt to have their cake (or red font) and eat it to. In my opinion it's too little, too late, but we'll have to see what the box office returns have to say.
but wait he is wearing a red tie…does that mean anything???
I think it was a last minute attempt to have their cake (or red font) and eat it to. In my opinion it's too little, too late, but we'll have to see what the box office returns have to say.
Now that you've cracked the Murphy code…who killed JFK? Watch the Zapruder film again, I beg you!
First Bigfoot, then Atlantis, followed by the mysterious many weights of Kirstie Alley and then JFK. Give me time, sir!
Now that you've cracked the Murphy code…who killed JFK? Watch the Zapruder film again, I beg you!
First Bigfoot, then Atlantis, followed by the mysterious many weights of Kirstie Alley and then JFK. Give me time, sir!
I must disagree with you on one point. Beverly Hills Cop III was not that bad of a movie. OK, I know that most sequels disappoint (except of course for Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, you can't fight me on that one), but this one was actually fairly well done. It is not as great as the first two films, but it also not as bad as most sequels the movie industry cranks out these days. (A Very Brady Sequel, Starship Troopers 2, Lost Boys 2, etc.) That summer, it also scored high at the box office. Reguardless, of whether it was as good as the original, it still raked in a ton of cash. In fact, I recently saw it being replayed on one of those Encore Movieplex cable channels. For a while, I believe, it was available on Comcast on Demand, but don't hold me to that…
As for Harrison Ford. He really hasn't made a great movie in years, yet this guy still earns millions every year. The last Raiders of the Lost Ark, was OK, but certainly the weakest of the franchise (see my above comment on sequels.) Outside of that, what has he done that's been great in years? Maybe Air Force One… and don't get me started on the absolutely embarassing CGI plane crash at the end. You know how this guy does well? Royalities. He still rakes it in from DVD and movie rebroadcast rights from his earlier hit blockbuster films.
I will close with this tip to anyone who wants to make it big in Hollywood…
Work on one great TV series or movie and you can put a roof over your head and provide for a family for years. Add another hit and it multiplies from there. It's like the old saying of taking a penny, multiplying it by two everyday, and in a year you will be a millionaire. Food for thought, huh?
Dear Jersey Joe,
Yes, Beverly Hills Cop III wasn't god-awful terrible like those other films. But it wasn't good for goodness sake. Aside from the obligatory John Landis-directed director cameo of George Lucas, there just wasn't anything interesting (or particularly funny about it). I remember seeing in the theaters on opening weekend in May 1994 at the Richland Mall Cinemas in Johnstown, Pa and even then, when my critical palate wasn't nearly as developed, thinking, "Gee, this is weird, I'm not really laughing at this like I thought I was going to be. In fact, I don't think it's very funny at all."
And while its box office total was many things, one thing that it did not was rake in a ton of cash. During its theatrical run it grossed on $42.6 million dollars, a pittance compared to $234.7 million and $153.6 million the first two grossed (not to mention the fact that the third part grossed this dismal total almost a decade after the original was released with much higher ticket prices).
I agree with you I would say "Air Force One" was Ford's last great film. However, like you, it's so hard to not laugh out loud at how bad that CGI-plane crash is. With that, an overall very good movie threatens to look like a theatrical version of "Seaquest DSV." The other Harrison Film I liked in the last decade or so was "What Lies Beneath" which has the brilliant twist of making Ford the villain at the end.
I must disagree with you on one point. Beverly Hills Cop III was not that bad of a movie. OK, I know that most sequels disappoint (except of course for Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, you can't fight me on that one), but this one was actually fairly well done. It is not as great as the first two films, but it also not as bad as most sequels the movie industry cranks out these days. (A Very Brady Sequel, Starship Troopers 2, Lost Boys 2, etc.) That summer, it also scored high at the box office. Reguardless, of whether it was as good as the original, it still raked in a ton of cash. In fact, I recently saw it being replayed on one of those Encore Movieplex cable channels. For a while, I believe, it was available on Comcast on Demand, but don't hold me to that…
As for Harrison Ford. He really hasn't made a great movie in years, yet this guy still earns millions every year. The last Raiders of the Lost Ark, was OK, but certainly the weakest of the franchise (see my above comment on sequels.) Outside of that, what has he done that's been great in years? Maybe Air Force One… and don't get me started on the absolutely embarassing CGI plane crash at the end. You know how this guy does well? Royalities. He still rakes it in from DVD and movie rebroadcast rights from his earlier hit blockbuster films.
I will close with this tip to anyone who wants to make it big in Hollywood…
Work on one great TV series or movie and you can put a roof over your head and provide for a family for years. Add another hit and it multiplies from there. It's like the old saying of taking a penny, multiplying it by two everyday, and in a year you will be a millionaire. Food for thought, huh?
Dear Jersey Joe,
Yes, Beverly Hills Cop III wasn't god-awful terrible like those other films. But it wasn't good for goodness sake. Aside from the obligatory John Landis-directed director cameo of George Lucas, there just wasn't anything interesting (or particularly funny about it). I remember seeing in the theaters on opening weekend in May 1994 at the Richland Mall Cinemas in Johnstown, Pa and even then, when my critical palate wasn't nearly as developed, thinking, "Gee, this is weird, I'm not really laughing at this like I thought I was going to be. In fact, I don't think it's very funny at all."
And while its box office total was many things, one thing that it did not was rake in a ton of cash. During its theatrical run it grossed on $42.6 million dollars, a pittance compared to $234.7 million and $153.6 million the first two grossed (not to mention the fact that the third part grossed this dismal total almost a decade after the original was released with much higher ticket prices).
I agree with you I would say "Air Force One" was Ford's last great film. However, like you, it's so hard to not laugh out loud at how bad that CGI-plane crash is. With that, an overall very good movie threatens to look like a theatrical version of "Seaquest DSV." The other Harrison Film I liked in the last decade or so was "What Lies Beneath" which has the brilliant twist of making Ford the villain at the end.
Red stands for power. No matter what industry you are in. Look at the president. When he wears a red tie… that is saying he is in control. The advertising company here is saying, hey this is a good movie and by using bold red text… we want you to believe it too.
Look at those posters again and imagine all of the red text, instead being black. Wouldn't fell as important to you would it? Why do you think stop signs are red? In the early days, they were yellow!
Great point! Why do you think red font works so well (and is used so often) for comedies and not dramatic features?
Red stands for power. No matter what industry you are in. Look at the president. When he wears a red tie… that is saying he is in control. The advertising company here is saying, hey this is a good movie and by using bold red text… we want you to believe it too.
Look at those posters again and imagine all of the red text, instead being black. Wouldn't fell as important to you would it? Why do you think stop signs are red? In the early days, they were yellow!
Great point! Why do you think red font works so well (and is used so often) for comedies and not dramatic features?
Maybe it's his signature laugh?
Great point! That laugh has been worth countless millions of dollars at the box office. Add a fat suit and you have pure gold.
Maybe it's his signature laugh?
Great point! That laugh has been worth countless millions of dollars at the box office. Add a fat suit and you have pure gold.
Postscript: The Eddie Murphy Code once again proved infallible. "Imagine That" looks to have an opening weekend box office of only $5-7million.
Postscript: The Eddie Murphy Code once again proved infallible. "Imagine That" looks to have an opening weekend box office of only $5-7million.